Hanson, Babchishin, May, Reid, & Wilson (2026). Risk tools predict recidivism for men with low intellectual ability and a history of sexual offending.
Marshall, Miller, Cortoni, & Helmus (2020). The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
Boccaccini, Rice, Helmus, Murrie & Harris (2017). Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.
Helmus & Thornton (2015). Stability and predictive and incremental accuracy of the individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R in predicting sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis.
Brouillette-Alarie, Hanson, Babchishin & Benbouriche (2014). De la prédiction à la compréhension : recension des dimensions psychologiques de la Statique-99.
Brouillette-Alarie, Hanson, Babchishin & Benbouriche (2014). From prediction to understanding: review of the psychological dimensions of Static-99.
Hanson, Lunetta, Phenix, Neeley & Epperson (2014). The field validity of Static-99/R sex offender risk assessment tool in California.