Your Cart

Helmus (2023) Cross cultural validity of risk tools.

Kelley (2023). Static-99R in the courtroom: Legal admissibility and testimony (U.S. context)

Babchishin & Helmus (2024). Presentation slides. What risk assessment tools are appropriate for men convicted of child sexual exploitation materials (CSEM) offences?

Seto (2025). Assessing men with child sexual exploitation material offenses: CPORT research updates.

Cortoni, F. (2025) From assessment to treatment for sexual recidivism

Marshall, Miller, Cortoni, & Helmus (2020). The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.

Boccaccini, Rice, Helmus, Murrie & Harris (2017). Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.

Helmus & Thornton (2015). Stability and predictive and incremental accuracy of the individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R in predicting sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis.

Brouillette-Alarie, Hanson, Babchishin & Benbouriche (2014). De la prédiction à la compréhension : recension des dimensions psychologiques de la Statique-99.

Brouillette-Alarie, Hanson, Babchishin & Benbouriche (2014). From prediction to understanding: review of the psychological dimensions of Static-99.